Tag Archives: Peacebuilding

Post-war Recovery

We had Dr David Connolly looking at Post-war recovery for three thought-provoking days this week.  David is originally from Belfast (and still has the brogue!) and he specialises in the theory and practice of post-war recovery and peacebuilding at York University.

A clip David used to talk about the traditional approach to Post-war Iraq

We examined many of the theoretical principles behind exclusive and more holistic inclusive post-war recovery/reconstruction.  The overall aim is to bridge the gap between conflict transformation and a society after conflict with a more sustainable, social, economic and political order.  David used examples from his precious research in Yemen, Indonesia, Afghanistan and Northern Ireland to back his proposals.  One of the quotes which stood out to me was actually from a report he published a few years again from home:

“I could cope with the war; it’s the peace I cannot manage” West Belfast Resident in 2007. (At a Post-conflict Juncture: An Assessment of Mental Health and Developmental Needs in Whiterock, Corpus Christi Services)

We also examined “Fragile States” and how conflict can play a part in this fragility.  What interested me the most was the models of international development/relief which “grafted” new practices onto existing local processes. Such as the example of the Community Development Councils (CDCs), in Afghanistan (which are part of the National Solidarity Programme) which use the pre-existing Shura, “consultation” process to disseminate funding and manage local projects etc.  Overall, David suggested using the term “Integrity” to replace the ideologies behind current “Good Governance” procedures to help maintain accountability, competencies and corruption control in post-war countries.

Dr David Connolly finishing up his final lecture on “Integrity”

There was a great deal to take in over the last few days and to be honest, this entire topic deserves its own blog and I don’t feel like I’m doing it any justice in this post.  More than ever though, I am appreciating the benefits of a Systemic Peacebuilding approach to this work (more to follow)

For more information on Post-war Recovery please check out the MA at York University.

Media in Conflict Situations

Lisa Monette, who works in Communications for the Canadian Government, facilitated  two days at the start of this week around the role of media in war and peacebuilding.  She focused on interview techniques, peace/conflict sensitive journalism and “anti rumour” campaigns.  To put  this type of journalism into context we were shown quite a few examples form the great work of “Search for Common Ground” such as their radio and television shows in various conflict zones around the world.

I also spent Wednesday evening running a workshop for my classmates on the role of social media in our own professional capacities through utilizing LinkedIn, Twitter, Hootsuite etc. to both gather and disseminate information.

Unwar the Web“: An example of a new social media campaign

The other theory that stuck out to me this week was Johan Galtung’s (1992) twelve points that concerns the values of what he calls war journalism.  I thought it would be worth mentioning them here as they offer some food for thought in regards to how we present information in this field:

  1. A focus on violence as its own cause-thus decontexualizing violence, not looking at the reasons,
  2. Dualism, always reduces to two parts, and hereof winners-losers which makes non-violent outcome ignored
  3. Manicheanism; the two parts consists of the contradictions good-evil,
  4. Armageddon, violence is inevitable,
  5. Focus on individual, avoiding structural causes,
  6. Making confusion by only a focus on battlefield and visible effects, not on underlying forces
  7. Excluding and omitting the bereaved, thus never explaining why there are actions of revenge/violence spirals
  8. Failure to explore the causes of escalation and the impact of media coverage itself,
  9. Failure to explore the goals of outside interventionists,
  10. Failure to explore peace proposals, and offer images of peaceful outcomes
  11. Confusing cease-fires and negotiations with actual peace, peace is defined as victory plus ceasefire
  12. Omitting reconciliation; and conflicts tend to re-emerge if wounds are not healed

You can find a more information around these points @ Journalism and power: The role of media in building human rights and a culture of peace